home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
Shareware Grab Bag
/
Shareware Grab Bag.iso
/
013
/
st225.arc
/
README.NOW
next >
Wrap
Text File
|
1987-01-06
|
4KB
|
133 lines
HOW TO GET THE BEST PERFORMANCE FROM THE
ST225/WD COMBINATION
The information contained in the other two files (WD.DOC &
WDCONFIG.DOC) provides the technical information necessary
to get a hard disk up and running. I changed some of the
examples to be specific to the Seagate ST225 20 Meg hard
disk and the Western Digital Controller, WD1002S-WX2. When
performing the debug low level format this controller will
respond with "WX2 Format Revision T.8...", if you get "WX2
Format Revision 6..." you have an older version and will
need to get a new EPROM with the T.8 software to maximize
the performance of the ST225.
My ST225 was slow, and relatively speaking, still is. I
had the older EEPROM so I could make no set up changes and
it had a CORE test(ver 2.7) performance index of .744.
Changing the EEPROM and using two values different from
the initial factory specs allowed me to get a performance
index of 1.377, an 89% improvement!! There was only a
relatively minor increase in seek time from 95.7 ms to
84.2 ms (the ST225 is rated at 65ms so mine is still a dog
in this area), but the data transfer rate improved from
28.4 KB/sec to 121.7 KB/sec!
The two areas I modified where the interleave factor from
the recommended 3 to 4 and the CCB option byte (step rate)
from 05 to 07. This combination proved to provide the best
performance after many complete formats were tested. I
tried interleaves of 3,4 and 5 combined with CCB values of
00, 03, 05 and 07. 00 formatted ok but hung up during the
Core test and 03 and 07 provided the same results. I have
heard somewhere that Western Digital had recommended the
07 combination so it is the one I use.
I normally run my XT Turbo clone at 8MHz and with a
"buffers=24" in my config.sys file as well as LIGHTNING
installed for the C drive with a cache size of 128K and it
is this setup that generated the following numbers from
the PC MAGAZINE benchmark test, version 4.
(512 bytes/512 records) OLD NEW
Sequential file creation: 11.10 sec 11.20 sec
" " writing: 14.34 " 9.12 "
" " reading: 12.25 " 6.92 "
Random " write: 14.01 " 10.21 "
" " read: 5.11 " 5.06 "
(4K bytes/64 records) OLD NEW
Sequential file creation: 10.88 sec 5.05 sec
" " writing: 9.95 " 4.07 "
" " reading: 12.96 " 5.00 "
Random " write: 5.22 " 3.02 "
" " read: 6.87 " 3.35 "
Reading 1000 random sectors: 167.14 msec 119.79 msec
1000 seeks - sequential: 21.31 msec 21.25 msec
" " - random: 96.83 " 85.79 "
I hope that this and the other two files are helpful and that
you are able to get the maximum performance from your system.
Neil Erbe
Tampa, Fl